From a3debb0d4638a714372895fec2218d735391ed26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zachary Vance Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 21:24:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix 2 --- articles/retirement_math2.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/articles/retirement_math2.md b/articles/retirement_math2.md index 638a355..b4dd503 100644 --- a/articles/retirement_math2.md +++ b/articles/retirement_math2.md @@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ Well, what if you're not making $60K and spending $20K? I'll walk you through th The rough[^5] estimate is that you can retire in: **25 x expenses / (income - expenses)** years. -Working through our example, that's = 25 * 20K / (60K/y - 20K/y) = 500K / 40K per year = 12.5 years. Imaginary-use is 20, so that works out to 32.5 years old. Checks out. +Working through our example, that's = 25 * 20K / (60K/y - 20K/y) = 500K / 40K per year = 12.5 years. Imaginary you is 20, so that works out to 32.5 years old. Checks out. Okay, but what if... the stock market takes a hit? -[>> up and down](/retirement_math3.md) +[>> up and down](/articles/retirement_math3.md) [^2]: Which I am 100% in favor of. Get cracking on that science. [^3]: This is very conservative. Since it's founding in 1957, the S&P 500 on average made 7% yearly over inflation. You can ajust the numbers if you want. -- 2.47.3